Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Radiother ; 25(5): 463-468, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023215

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The 5-fraction scheme (5×5-5.5Gy) is a common High-Dose Rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy regimen for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Yet, its equivalence with Pulse-Dose rate (PDR) schemes remains unproved. The present study aimed at reporting on the outcome of LACC patients treated with 5-fraction HDR brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all consecutive patients treated with curative-intent HDR brachytherapy for a LACC in a French Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-eight LACC patients underwent a 5-fraction intracavitary HDR brachytherapy between 2015 and 2019 (median dose=25Gy/5 fractions, following external-beam radiotherapy). Median age at diagnosis was 60 (range: 29-87). Thirty-one patients (81.5%) underwent concurrent chemotherapy. Tumor stages ranged from 3 IB2 (7.8%), 4 IB3 (10.5%), 4 IIA2 (10.5%), 12 IIB (31.7%), 1 IIIA (2.6%), 2 IIIB (5.3%), 7 IIIC1 (18.5%), 4 IIIC2 (10.5%), 1 IVA (2.6%) (2018 FIGO). Median D90% to CTVHR reached 79.5Gy (EQD2). Median D90% to CTVIR reached 59.5Gy (EQD2). Median Bladder D2cc was 69.8Gy (EQD2). Median Rectum D2cc was 58.3Gy (EQD2). Acute/late grade 3 toxicity was reported in one patient (2.6%). No grade 4-5 toxicity occurred. At a median 38 months follow-up, 10 patients (26.3%) had local (n=7, 18.4%), nodal (n=6, 15.7%) and/or distant (n=7, 18.4%) relapse. Three-year overall survival rate was of 81.6%. CONCLUSION: The 5-fraction HDR scheme was well tolerated even in frail patients. Three-year local control was lower than expected. Treatment (absence of parametrial interstitial implants and use of cervical EBRT boost) and patients' characteristics (age, comorbidities) may explain such results.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia
2.
Cancer Radiother ; 24(3): 258-266, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229067

RESUMO

The incidence of oropharyngeal cancer induced by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is steadily increasing in developed countries. These tumors are more chemoradiosensitive and have a better prognosis than HPV-negative one. In addition, they occur in younger and better-off patients with longer life expectancy. Current radiotherapy and chemotherapy protocols are currently being questioned as they may expose HPV-positive patients to excessive treatment and unnecessary toxic effects. Less intensive treatment regimens could possibly achieve similar efficacy with lower toxicity and improved quality of life. The aim of this work was to summarize the knowledge on these tumors and their implications for radiation oncologists. In this update, we will discuss ongoing de-escalation trials and highlight the issues raised by these studies. We will also comment on the results of recently published de-intensification studies. Three main strategies are analyzed in the present article: the de-escalation of the drug associated with radiotherapy, the de-escalation of the radiotherapy dose (in concomitant chemoradiotherapy, after induction chemotherapy, in a postoperative setting) and de-escalation of radiation target volumes. Our findings ultimately indicate that clinicians should not change the management of oropharyngeal cancer patients outside of clinical trials.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Fatores Etários , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Expectativa de Vida , Uso Excessivo dos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/classificação , Prognóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Radio-Oncologistas , Dosagem Radioterapêutica
3.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 15(1): 8-11, 2014 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24939257

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: One of the most significant side effects of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers is xerostomia as a result of salivary gland damage. Considering pharmaco- logical effects of propolis, we evaluated its protective effect on salivary glands subjected to radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one male albino rats (8-11 W, 190 ± 5 gm) were divided into three groups of seven animals. Scintigraphy was performed in all the groups. Then groups 1 (S) and 2 (SR) received normal saline injections and group 3 (PR) received propolis injection over 3 days. After that groups 2 and 3 were exposed to gamma radiation and all the rats underwent scintigraphic assessment on third day and 70th day after irradiation. The lips and tongues of rats in groups 2 and 3 were examined for mucositis daily in first 10 days. At the end, the parotid glands of all rats were examined histologically. RESULTS: Scintigraphy results of third and 70th day after irradiation showed statistically significant differences between PR and SR as well as SR and S. However, there was no significant difference between the PR and S groups. Histopathologic assessment demonstrated significant difference between SR, PR and S. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that propolis has protective effects on salivary gland function in animal models whilst it did not prevent radiation-induced histologic changes in tissues. Further investigations are needed to elucidate mechanisms of propolis actions. Clinical significance: Regarding to the results of this study, propolis may be useful in reduction xerostomia due to radiation to salivary glands and may be helpful for head and neck cancer patients.


Assuntos
Raios gama/efeitos adversos , Glândula Parótida/efeitos da radiação , Própole/uso terapêutico , Protetores contra Radiação/uso terapêutico , Adipócitos/patologia , Adipócitos/efeitos da radiação , Animais , Células do Tecido Conjuntivo/patologia , Células do Tecido Conjuntivo/efeitos da radiação , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Lábio/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Modelos Animais , Tamanho do Órgão , Glândula Parótida/diagnóstico por imagem , Glândula Parótida/efeitos dos fármacos , Cintilografia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Ductos Salivares/patologia , Ductos Salivares/efeitos da radiação , Estomatite/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Língua/efeitos da radiação , Xerostomia/etiologia
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24505551

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Colorectal cancer most commonly metastasizes to the liver and lung. Metastatic colon carcinoma (MCC) to the breast is extremely rare. Krukenberg tumor is an uncommon metastatic tumor of the ovary. CASE PRESENTATION: A 38 years woman presented with abdominal pain. In evaluation colon cancer was diagnosed at stage 3. FOLFOX chemotherapy was done. After one year she developed Krukenberg tumor. Few days after ovarian tumor resection breast tumor was diagnosed. In immunohistochemistry both ovarian and breast tumors was CK7 negative, CK20 positive, compatible with colon cancer origin. This is the first case of simultaneous metastasis of colon cancer to two rare sites.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...